In Vitro Anti-Oxidant Activity of
the Various Extracts of Cassia auriculata L. Flower by UV Spectrophotometer
M.
Elayarani1, P. Shanmuganathan1 and P. Muthukumaran2*
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Meenakshi
Chandrasekaran College of Arts and Science, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur, Tamil
Nadu
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: kumaran.bio82@yahoo.com;
muthubabi_p@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT:
The present study was carried out in In-vitro
antioxidant effects of the Petroleum Ether, Ethanol, and Methanolic flower
extracts of Cassia auriculata
L . The powder of flower of Cassia auriculata L was extracted
sequentially with petroleum ether, ethanol and methanol using Soxhlet extractor
and it was subjected to preliminary phytochemical studies for the
identification of phytoconstituents by chemical
tests. Antioxidant activity of the extract was evaluated by using Diphenyl picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, and reducing power
methods. The extracts of Cassia auriculata L had
shown good DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl) radical scavenging activity.
BHA was used as standard antioxidant and positive control. The DPPH radical
scavenging activity of the extracts was increased with the increasing
concentration, the reducing power of extracts was carried out with ascorbic
acid as a standard reducing agent. The Methanolic extract of Cassia auriculata
L exhibited higher scavenging and reducing power than the other extracts. All
the analysis was made with the use of UV Visible Spectrophotometer (Systronics 117, India). The observation suggest that the
flower of Cassia auriculata
L extracts has potent dose dependent
anti oxidant activity, thus the Ethanobotanical claim
of the plant being used in the cardio vascular disorder, muscle build up, nephro protection, anti inflammatory and as an aphrodisiac
may be in part due to the antioxidant activity and also the presence of saponins and traces of Flavanoids
ascertains that the Anti-oxidant activity
KEYWORDS: Cassia auriculata L , antioxidant,
reducing Power, DPPH, BHA, Ascorbic Acid
INTRODUCTION:
Antioxidants are
radical scavengers which protect the human body against free radicals that may
cause pathological conditions such as ischemia, anaemia,
asthma, arthritis, inflammation, neurodegeneration,
Parkinson's diseases, mongolism, ageing process and perhaps dementias1
Flavonoids and flavones are widely distributed
secondary metabolites with antioxidant and antiradical properties2.
The medicinal actions of plants are unique to particular plant species or
groups are consistent with this concept as the combination of secondary
products in a particular plant is taxonomically distinct. Antioxidant-based
dugs/formulations for the prevention and treatment of complex diseases like
atherosclerosis, stroke, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer have
appeared during the last 3 decades3.
This has attracted a
great deal of research interest in natural antioxidants. Subsequently, a
worldwide trend towards the use of natural phytochemicals
present in berry crops, tea, herbs, oilseeds, beans, fruits, and vegetables has
increased. Several herbs and spices have been reported to exhibit antioxidant
activity, including rosemary, sage, thyme, nutmeg, turmeric, white pepper,
chili pepper, ginger, and several Chinese medicinal plants extracts4.
The majority of the active antioxidant constituents are flavonoids,
isoflavones, flavones, anthrocyanins,
coumarins, lignans, catechins, and isocatechins. In
addition to the above compounds found in natural foods, vitamins C and E,
beta-carotene, and tocopherol are known to possess
antioxidant potential5. With this background and abundant source of
unique active components harbored in plants. The present study was taken up on
one medicinal plant namely of Cassia auriculata L belongs to the Caesalpiniaceae family.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Material:
Plant material the
leaves of Cassia auriculata
L were collected from in and around Thanjavur, Tamilnadu India.. Dried flower
samples were ground into a uniform powder using a blender and stored in polythene
bags at room temperature.
Preparation of
Extracts:
The flowers of Cassia auriculata
L were air-dried, pulverized. Sieve the powder was extracted sequentially with
petroleum ether, ethanol and methanol using soxhlet
extractor and concentrated under reduced pressure using flash evaporator and
stored in screw cap vials.
Phytochemical Screening:6- 8
Phytochemical
screenings were performed Using standard procedures. Phytochemical studies
reveal the presence of Sterols, Saponins, and
Flavanoids9.
Antioxidant Assay:
The antioxidant
activity of Plant extracts was determined by different in-vitro methods such
as, the DPPH free radical scavenging assay and reducing power methods. The
different extracts were dissolved in methanol at the concentration of 2mg/ml.
all the assays were carried out in triplicate and average value was considered.
a. DPPH Radical
scavenging activity:
DPPH scavenging
activity of the plant extract was carried out according to the method of Koleva .I et al.,10,11.
0.2 ml of methanolic solution of plant extract samples at different
concentration (50- 250μg/ml) was mixed with 0.8 ml of Tris
HCL buffer (100Mm, pH 7.4). One ml DPPH (500 M in methanol) solution was added
to above mixture. The mixture was shaken vigorously and incubated for 30min in
room temperature. Absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 517nm
UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (Systronics UV-Visible Spectophotometer 117, INDIA). All the assays were carried
out in triplicates with BHA (Butylated Hydroxy Anisole) as a positive control. Blank was prepared
with the addition of DPPH and for control 0.2 ml of methanol (without plant
extract) was added. Percentage of DPPH scavenging activity determined as
follows
(Absorbance of
control – Absorbance
% DPPH radical = of test Sample) x 100
-scavenging ----------------------------------------------
Absorbance
of control
Decreased absorbance of
the reaction mixture indicates stronger DPPH radical-scavenging activity. In this
study, Petroleum Ether, Ethanol and Methanolic flower extracts of Cassia auriculata
L were used.
b. Reducing Power:
This was carried out as
described previously [12]. 1 ml of plant extract solution (final concentration
100- 500 mg/l) was mixed with 2.5 ml phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5
ml potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe (CN6)] (10g/l), and
then mixture was incubated at 50 degree C for 20 minutes. Two and one-half, 2.5
ml of trichloroacetic acid (100g/l) was added to the
mixture, which was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Finally, 2.5 ml of
the supernatant solution was mixed with 2.5 ml of distilled water and 0.5 ml
Fecl3 (1g/l) and absorbance measured at 700nm in UV-Visible Spectrophotometer (Systronics UV-Visible Spectophotometer
117, INDIA). As a control, ascorbic acid was used (final concentration 10
mg/ml). Increased absorbance of the reaction mixture indicates stronger
reducing power. In this study, petroleum ether, ethanol and methanolic flower
extracts of Cassia auriculata
L were used.
Statistical analysis:
All the values of the experimental results were
expressed as Mean ±S.D
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Phytochemical
Screening:
Phytochemical studies reveal that the presence of
Sterols, Saponins, and Flavonoids
in Methanolic and Ethanolic extracts while only sterols are present in
petroleum ether extract (Table 1).
Antioxidant Assay:
a.
DPPH
Scavenging Activity:
The Scavenging effect
of Petroleum ether, Ethanolic, Methanolic extracts of Cassia auriculata L and
BHA on the DPPH radical is illustrated in Table No: 2. Methanolic and Ethanolic
extracts have significant scavenging effect on DPPH, it was increased with the
increasing concentration from 50- 250μg/ml but the scavenging activity of
all extracts was lower than that of standard.
b. Reducing Power:
Different extracts of Cassia auriculata
L exhibited good reducing power. The reducing power of the plant extract was
determined by the method of Yildirim, A., et al. High
absorbance indicates high reducing power. Reducing power of the Methanolic and
Ethanolic extracts was dose dependent but the petroleum ether extract had shown
negligible effect and is presented in Table 3.
Table No: 1. Phytochemical Screening of Cassia auriculata L
|
Extract |
Sterols |
Saponins |
Flavonoids |
Alkaloid |
|
Petroleum Ether flower
extracts of Cassia auriculata |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
|
Ethanol,
flower extracts of Cassia auriculata |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
Methanolic
flower extracts of Cassia auriculata |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
Table No: 2. Radical Scavenging activity of various
extracts of Cassia auriculata L by
DPPH Method
|
Conc. of μg/ml |
% Inhibition by concentration petroleum ether extract of Cassia auriculata |
% Inhibition by concentration
ethanolic extract of Cassia auriculata |
% Inhibition by concentration
methanolic extract of Cassia auriculata |
% Inhibition by BHA |
|
50 |
4.33±5.25 |
18.66±5.84 |
18.85±4.85 |
38.59±4.78 |
|
100 |
6.79±2.31 |
37.21±3.97 |
39.47±5.23 |
60.84±4.35 |
|
150 |
9.12±6.50 |
45.94±5.24 |
46.31±6.55 |
70.06±2.54 |
|
200 |
10.21±3.95 |
50.56±1.32 |
51.43±4.73 |
76.54±5.12 |
|
250 |
12.45±3.39 |
61.67±5.98 |
65.42±3.33 |
83.27±4.11 |
Data are expressed as mean±SD
of triplicate tests
Table No: 3. Reducing Power of various extracts of Cassia auriculata L
|
Conc. Of μg/ml |
Reducing power of petroleum ether extract of Cassia auriculata |
Reducing power of concentration
ethanolic extract of Cassia auriculata |
Reducing power of concentration
methanolic extract of Cassia auriculata |
Reducing power of Ascorbic acid |
|
50 |
10.23±1.25 |
43.16±4.18 |
43.44±3.89 |
51.94±2.78 |
|
100 |
18.48±2.18 |
51.34±2.64 |
52.14±4.31 |
59.22±3.25 |
|
150 |
20.89±6.25 |
65.98±3.21 |
67.08±5.36 |
70.18±2.14 |
|
200 |
21.64±4.11 |
80.14±3.90 |
82.19±3.18 |
90.48±3.81 |
|
250 |
25.56±4.17 |
85.12±2.41 |
90.49±4.21 |
96.00±4.81 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate tests
CONCLUSION:
Based on the results
described, it may be concluded that the petroleum ether extract shown less
significant scavenging and reducing power may be due to the absence of saponins and Flavonoids. The anti
oxidant potential of Methanolic and Ethanolic extracts may be attributed to the
presence of saponins and Flavonoids.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
This work is carried at
the Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Meenakshi Chandrasekaran
College of Arts and Science, Pattukkottai, Thanjavur(Dt), Tamilnadu. Authors are highly thankful to the Secretary and
the Principal for providing the facilities.
REFERENCES:
1.
Polterait O. Antioxidants and free-radical Scavengers of
Natural origin Current Org Chem 1(1997) 415-440.
2.
Nakayoma J and Yamada M. Suppression of active oxygen-indeed cyto toxicity by flavonoids. Biochem. Pharmcol 45 (1995)265-267
3.
Devasagayam T.P.A., Tilak J.C., Boloor K.K. Review: Free radicals and Prosp.
JAPI. 52 (2004)794-804.
4.
Lee S.E., Hwang H. J. and Ha J. S. Screening of medicinal plant extracts
for antioxidant activity. Life Sci 73(2003) 167- 179
5.
Prior R.L. Fruit and vegetables in the prevention of cellular oxidative
damage. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 78(2003) 570S-578S.
6.
Faraz, M., Mohammad, K., Naysaneh,
G. and Hamid, R.V. Phytochemical screening of some
species of Iranian plants, Iranian J of
pharmaceutical Research (2003) 77-82.
7.
Harborne, J.B. 1998. Phytochemical
methods. In A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis 3rd ed., pp. 40-137. London: Chapman and Hall;
8.
Edeoga, H.O., Okwu, D.E. and Mbaebie, B.O.. Phytochemical
constituents of some Nigerian medicinal plants, African J of Biotechnology 4(2005)
685-688
9.
Trease G. E. and Evans W. C. Trease
and Evans Pharmacognosy: A Physicians's Guide to
Herbal Medicine. 13th Edition. Bailliere, Tindall. London 1989;145-147.
10. Koleva I. I., Van Beek T. A., Linssen J.P.H., De Groot A, Evstatieva L.N.
Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on
three testing methods. Phytochemical Analysis. 13 (2002) 8-17
11. Mathiesen, L., Malterud,
K.E. and Sund R.B. Antioxidant activity of fruit
exudates and methylated dihydrochalcones
from Myrica gale. Planta
Med. 61(1995) 515- 518.
12. Yildirim, A., Mavi
A., and Kara A. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49(2001) 4083-4089.
Received on 19.07.2011 Accepted on 22.08.2011
© Asian Pharma Press All
Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 1(3): July-Sept. 2011; Page 70-72